All our latest updates, clarifications and training news
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

View this in a browser.

Issue 32 | 12 November 2025

Practice and Process archive

Welcome to issue 32 of Practice and Process. This month we feature two blogs by HM Land Registry experts that we hope will answer many of your questions about dealing with restrictions in the register and using Qualified Electronic Signatures. To ensure you never miss a practice blog, you can sign up to receive email updates.

 

PG20

A red postbox set into a stone wall with a plant border below the box.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 20: home rights and applications under the Family Law Act 1996

When did it change?
13 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended multiple sections.

What does it mean for customers?

The content of our existing guidance has been revised to clarify where applications can be lodged by post and how to make applications using our digital channels.

There are no substantive changes to practice resulting from these amendments.

 

PG26

A man in a shirt and tie, sitting at a desk, examines a document held in his left hand with a pen poised above it in his right hand.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 26: leases – determination

When did it change?
13 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended section 14.

What does it mean for customers?
The guidance has been amended to remind customers to provide appropriate documentary evidence for any incumbrances that are to be discharged, withdrawn or cancelled upon the determination of a leasehold estate by merger, surrender or disclaimer.

Guidance on considering incumbrances affecting a determined lease can be found in section 2.1.2 of the practice guide.

 

PG40

s2

An HM Land Registry caseworker examines a plan on a desktop screen, while holding a paper document in their left hand.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 40, supplement 2: Preparing plans for HM Land Registry applications

When did it change?
13 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended sections 1 and 3.

What does it mean for customers?
The guidance has been amended to clarify that plans to official searches of part are considered using the same guidelines as transfers or leases of part.

The guidelines for preparing plans for HM Land Registry applications can be found in section 9 of the practice guide.

 

PG42

A contemporary block of flats viewed from below, with balconies on the lower storeys to the left and a taller neighbouring block to the right.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 42: upgrading the class of title 

When did it change?
6 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended section 3.2.2.

What does it mean for customers?

The guidance has been amended to clarify our practice on upgrading a qualified title.


Unlike possessory titles, qualified titles do not become eligible for upgrade after the passage of a set period of time.

 

PG50

A screenshot of the View Applications guidance page on GOV.UK.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 50: requisition and cancellation procedures 

When did it change?
20 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended section 2.

What does it mean for customers?

The guidance has been amended to clarify that View Applications is only available to portal users and will only show Business Gateway applications if your organisation has integrated directly with HM Land Registry systems.

 

PG62

A country path with a fence to its right curves towards the horizon, where a row of trees sits beneath white clouds in a blue sky.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 62: easements 

When did it change?
6 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended sections 2.2, 2.3 and 3.2.

What does it mean for customers?

The guidance has been amended to reflect new practice on the registration of easements using form AN1 where only the servient land is registered and the registration requirements have not been met.

From 6 October 2025, we will make a specific entry when an easement has not been completed by registration in accordance with section 27 of the Land Registration Act 2002 and so does not operate at law.

Details of our former practice can be found in section 2.3 of the practice guide, and details of the entry we will make can be found in section 3.2 of the practice guide.

 

PG78

A sign points towards reception at HM Land Registry's Croydon Office.

Which practice guide has changed?
Practice guide 78: overseas entities

When did it change?
13 October 2025

What has changed?
We have amended section 5.5.

What does it mean for customers?

The guidance has been amended for customers seeking an arrangement regarding execution to include contact details for our Commercial Arrangements Section in Croydon.

From our experts

An HM Land Registry caseworker examines a plan on a desktop screen, while a colleague standing to his right discusses the application with him.

How to deal with restrictions in the register

We see a lot of applications seeking to disapply or modify a restriction in the title register where this is either incorrect or unnecessary. In this blog, senior practitioners consider how best – from HM Land Registry's point of view – to tackle restrictions that are no longer fit for purpose.


Read more>>


 

Qualified Electronic Signatures: answering your questions


Following our recent announcement that we will accept Qualified Electronic Signatures, we've put together answers to your most frequently asked questions to help you understand how this is working in practice.


Read more>>



Head and shoulders portrait of Adam Hookway.

Ask Adam

Questions about deeds of covenant, no-value transfers and village green ownership are all in a day's work for Customer Policy Manager Adam Hookway. What would you like to Ask Adam?

Anonymous: If a registered proprietor whose property is mortgaged enters into a deed of covenant creating a restrictive covenant over the property in favour of their neighbour but does not secure the consent of their mortgagee, will the Land Registry note the restrictive covenant on the title on an application in form AN1 by the neighbour? Does it make any difference for this purpose if there is the usual restriction on the title to the effect that no dispositions are to be registered without the mortgagee’s consent?


Adam: Yes, a deed of covenant can generally be protected by an agreed notice, provided it creates a proprietary interest and does not fall within the exceptions outlined in section 33 of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002).


A restriction in the register (which is likely to be in Form P in these circumstances) will not prevent the AN1 being completed as it is not a ‘disposition’. However, we are likely to inform the lender of the entry.

 

Anonymous: Two directors in the firm are the executors of the estate of X and have obtained official copies of a property X owned with his ex-partner, Y. The property register shows that it is registered in the names of X and Y as joint tenants.


Z (daughter and attorney of X) has told us that the JT was severed during X’s lifetime (2 weeks prior to X's death). We have been in touch with the solicitor who did this and they have provided us with the Notice of Severance and evidence of it being served on Y. The severance was signed by Z in her capacity as attorney of X and Z also signed a SEV which was not submitted to the LR by her solicitors prior to X's death.


We are unsure of the steps now needing to be taken (and by whom) to effect registration of the severance and the documentation required by the Land Registry, given the death of X.


Please can you assist?


Adam: You can make an application to update the register re the death of X and the severance as appropriate. Form DJP plus certified copy of the death certificate for the former. And form RX1 or form SEV and supporting evidence as appropriate for the latter.


As to who makes the application that would be a matter for you, the executors of X and the surviving joint owner Y or their attorney Z.


Section 3 of practice guide 24 explains how to apply to register restrictions to protect a private trust and section 8.10 refers specifically to severance of an equitable joint tenancy.


See GOV.UK for more information and videos relating to updating property records when a proprietor has died.

 

Anonymous: What is the best way to deal with interests that are being transferred for no value to avoid a requisition asking for the value? For example, freehold reversions subject to long leases or others where the clients are able to tell us the value is definitely under £100,000 but have not had formal valuations. Should we just assign a nominal £1 value?


Adam: No, you must not assign a nominal value unless that is the actual consideration. For illustrative purposes, if using a TR1 you would complete panel 8 by selecting the second box to confirm the transfer is not for money or anything that has monetary value, if that is the case.


However, we still require the value for fee calculation purposes and to allow us to fulfil, where practicable, our duty to enter the price paid or value declared for the registered estate under rule 8 of the Land Registration Rules 2003.


If you consider it necessary, you may wish to explain what the value is and why you are paying the stated fee under the fee order. If the precise value cannot be provided you can confirm, if such be the case, that the value is ‘less than £100,000’.

 

Anonymous: For Land Registry purposes what is the status of a person registered in the Ownership Register under the Commons Registration Act 1965 as owner of a village green? What, if any, evidence would be required to register the title at the Land Registry bearing in mind that there is likely to be little documentation and the person registered as owner would not – by definition – have exclusive possession? The CRA owner in this case being a Parish Council.


Adam: Registration under the Commons Registration Act 1965 (CRA 1965) is not conclusive proof of ownership of land. In most instances, we will still require the usual documentary evidence of title (see practice guide 1: first registrations). If this is not available, we may be able to consider an application based on lost title deeds (see practice guide 2: first registration of title if deeds are lost or destroyed). There is nothing express to say an individual cannot be in adverse possession of common land. As explained in Powell v McFarlane (1977) 38 P & CR 452, possession relates to an appropriate degree of physical control depending on the nature of the land. However, if a person is registered as owner of land under the CRA 1965, there is case law to suggest they cannot be in possession of the land (Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Twin Rivers Parish Council (16 March 1987, unreported)).


The only exception to the above is where the land vested in a local authority or parish council under s8(4) CRA 1965. In those circumstances, we may register based on the CRA 1965 registration alone. However, as it is unclear whether such vesting divests another person of their estate, we can only register the local authority with qualified title.

 

Anonymous: I am dealing with a lifetime settlement created by Mr & Mrs K in 2017. In the settlement, Mr and Mrs K appointed Mrs B as the sole trustee. The title to the property which was subject to the terms of the settlement was transferred to Mrs B in 2017. Mrs B moved to Spain in 2018, so the settlement became resident offshore after 6 months of her move. Mrs K died in 2024. Mr K had power in the settlement to remove trustees and appoint new trustees, and duly did so in 2024, when he removed Mrs B, and appointed Mrs AK and CTC in her place. Mrs AK and CTC used their power to appoint the property out of the settlement to Mr K absolutely in 2025. The property remains in the name of Mrs B, and she does not appear to be willing to provide any assistance with transferring the property into the name of Mr K. Ordinarily, Mrs AK and CTC would lodge the Deed of Removal and Appointment of Trustees at HM Land Registry under s.40 Trustee Act 1925 automatic vesting rules. However, I understand that Mrs B's identification would be required to be verified, or an ID5 submitted. At this stage, this is unlikely to be possible. Therefore, my question is, can Mrs AK and CTC lodge the deed at HM Land Registry without identification for Mrs B, as automatic vesting should apply, together with evidence that the property forms part of the settlement and that Mr K was entitled to remove Mrs B as a trustee of the settlement, and appoint Mrs AK and CTC as trustees?


Adam: Your enquiry is a very specific one and best answered with an understanding of the property and title number(s) involved. This type of enquiry is best raised through our Ask for Guidance service.

Send us your questions for Adam

Visited our training hub recently?


Our training hub provides access to a wealth of free, easy-to-find and easy-to-follow guidance and training materials on hundreds of topics – all in one place – to help you prepare and submit complete and correct applications, and make the best use of HM Land Registry services.


Along with practice guides, you'll find links to workshops and webinars, videos, podcasts, checklists and flowcharts.

We regularly add to the content, so we recommend you bookmark the page and visit regularly.


Join our customer webinars

Are you using DRS?

Have you read our Strategy 2025+?

© 2025 Microsoft Dynamics. All rights reserved.

HM Land Registry, Trafalgar House, 1 Bedford Park, Croydon, CR0 2AQ

Manage your preferences